Honestly, the headline number matters less than the narrative it reinforces. El Salvador adding to its reserves is basically a sovereignty-level DCA strategy — it signals that a nation-state is willing to treat BTC as a long-term reserve asset rather than a trading position. The real impact is on three fronts: (1) the 'national allocation' narrative gets another data point, which keeps the sovereign-adoption conversation alive; (2) it reinforces the idea of long-term lock-up, since these coins are unlikely to hit the market anytime soon; (3) it keeps BTC in the mainstream policy discussion, which matters more than the actual purchase size. That said, I'd be cautious about over-amplifying it. The absolute size is still small relative to global markets, and the market has already priced in this pattern to some degree — so the marginal impact of each new purchase tends to diminish. It's more of a sentiment and narrative driver than a liquidity event. Whether the market keeps amplifying it probably depends on whether other countries follow suit or whether institutions start citing it as a precedent. Not financial advice, just my two sats.