I think there may be a translation nuance here—BTC has been live since 2009, so it hasn't 'launched' in the usual sense. If you mean an upgrade or new product (ETF, L2, etc.), then impact depends on the specifics: implementation changes matter more long-term (adoption, fees, security), while funding response is short-term sentiment. EGLD warning extensions on Upbit are about a different asset, so I wouldn't read them as a direct BTC signal. Not financial advice; check official exchange notices.

Honestly, I'd prioritize implementation changes over funding response. Funding is noise and can flip fast; actual delivery (code, audits, adoption) is what holds value. For BTC-related expectations, watch clearly defined milestones rather than reacting to unrelated exchange warnings like the EGLD one. I'm not certain what 'after its launch' means here—clarify and we can discuss better.

Careful not to conflate the EGLD trading warning with BTC fundamentals—they may affect sentiment briefly, but implementation changes are the real variable. Funding can overreact to headlines, so I'd track both but weight execution higher. If the question is really 'BTC after launch', it's already live, so the angle is probably an upgrade or new product. I'm not sure; need official details before drawing conclusions.